Daily Loss Limits and Profit Targets
An evaluation has one rule that pays you and two that can end you. The profit target sets the finish line; the daily loss limit and the overall drawdown decide whether you reach it.
The profit target
The target is the profit you must reach to clear the evaluation, quoted against the account size. It is a ceiling on how long you can take, not a deadline in itself — most futures programmes no longer run a hard time limit, but many do require a minimum number of trading days, so hitting the target in one lucky session rarely finishes the job.
Lark Funding: Rules differ by programme and change often — open the firm's own plan page and read the current terms against what you just read here.
View Challenge OptionsThe daily loss limit
The daily limit caps how much you may lose in a single session. Firms measure it in one of two ways: from your balance at the session open, or as a floor on equity that includes open, unrealised losses. The second version is much stricter — a position that is temporarily deep underwater can breach it before you ever close the trade.
Breaching the daily limit usually ends the attempt outright, not just the day. Treat the published number as the hard failure line and set your own stop well inside it.
How the two limits interact
The daily limit is almost always the rule that ends an account, because it is reachable in a single bad session while the overall drawdown takes several. The practical consequence: your position size should be derived from the daily limit, and your patience from the target.
Aqua Futures: Rules differ by programme and change often — open the firm's own plan page and read the current terms against what you just read here.
See Current PricingWorked example
A 50,000 account with a 3,000 profit target, a 2,000 overall drawdown and a 1,000 daily loss limit.
- Set a personal daily stop at 500 — half the published limit. Now two bad days in a row still leave the account alive.
- Risk 125 per trade, so a losing day is four trades, not one. On MES that is a handful of points; on ES the same risk is one quarter of the contracts.
- To clear 3,000 you need roughly six clean 500-days across the required minimum trading days. That is a realistic plan, and it never requires a single oversized trade.
Flip it around: risking 500 per trade makes the published daily limit two losing trades away, and the whole evaluation four. That is not a strategy, it is a coin toss with a fee.
Common mistakes
- Trading right up to the published daily limit instead of a self-imposed fraction of it.
- Ignoring whether the limit is measured on balance or on equity — that difference decides whether an open trade can fail you.
- Increasing size after a green day, so one red day erases a week.
- Chasing the target near the end and breaching the daily limit on the last leg.
- Forgetting the minimum-trading-day requirement and assuming the target alone finishes the evaluation.
Before you buy
Read the daily limit, the target and the drawdown model together — they only make sense as a set — and check the payout rules that apply after you pass.
Futures firms we cover
Every firm below publishes its own current rules and pricing. Use this page as the checklist and the firm's site as the source of truth.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. If you purchase through one of these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Our recommendations are based on the factors explained on each page.
Alpha Futures
Futures (US equity index) • Commodities
Traders who want a dedicated futures-only evaluation provider rather than a multi-asset firm.
- Platforms
- ProjectX / Quantower (AlphaTicks)
- Drawdown type
- End-of-day trailing max loss (not intraday)
- Micro contracts
- Not specified
- Payout speed
- Not specified
- Performance fee cap up to $15,000 per request on Standard/Advanced plans
- End-of-day trailing max loss rather than intraday trailing
- Fast processing reported — verify current turnaround with the firm
High fee caps and fair end-of-day rules suit traders who want room to scale withdrawals.
Top One Futures
Futures
Traders comparing futures evaluation programs who want to check current plan structures directly.
- Platforms
- Tradovate / NinjaTrader; Project X mentioned — verify
- Drawdown type
- Not specified
- Micro contracts
- Not specified
- Payout speed
- Not specified
- 90% profit split
- Fast payouts (under 24h claimed) — not fully verified
- No minimum trading days on some programs
- Instant Sim Funded options available
High split and rapid payouts with relatively flexible rules.
Aqua Futures
Futures (CME, COMEX, NYMEX, CBOT)
Futures traders shortlisting newer programs alongside established providers.
- Platforms
- ProjectX / related sim platforms (reported)
- Drawdown type
- End-of-day drawdown mode
- Micro contracts
- Not specified
- Payout speed
- Not specified
- Up to 100% profit split
- End-of-day drawdown mode
- Account sizes $25K–$150K
- Instant funding options available
High split potential with clearly published parameters.
BlueberryFunded Futures
Forex • Indices • Metals • Crypto (plan dependent)
Traders who want a futures track from a broker-backed funding brand.
- Platforms
- MT5, TradeLocker, DXTrade (reported)
- Drawdown type
- Not specified
- Micro contracts
- Not specified
- Payout speed
- Not specified
- Broker-backed by Blueberry Markets
- Prime 2-Step, Flex 1-Step and Instant models
- No evaluation time limit
- 80% split, up to 90%
Broker-backed stability and flexible evaluation models.
Blue Guardian Futures
Futures
Traders who prefer an established funding brand that also runs a futures programme.
- Platforms
- Tradovate, DeepCharts (reported)
- Drawdown type
- End-of-day trailing drawdown on many plans
- Micro contracts
- Not specified
- Payout speed
- Not specified
- End-of-day trailing drawdown on many plans
- Splits up to 90–100% on certain tiers
- Standard, Guardian, Instant and Express plans
- Scaling and micro scaling available
Realistic risk rules plus multiple entry paths, including instant.
Lark Funding
Forex / multi (platform dependent)
Traders reviewing challenge structures across several futures programmes before committing.
- Platforms
- DXTrade (TradingView integration), cTrader
- Drawdown type
- Not specified
- Micro contracts
- Not specified
- Payout speed
- Not specified
- No time limit
- No consistency rules
- Automatic pass on reaching target
- 14-day payouts
Appeals to traders frustrated by traditional challenge pressure.
Ready to check real evaluation terms?
Our comparison links to each firm's own plan page, where the current target, daily limit and drawdown are published.